247189 vues

Github

Sébastien Merour
publié le 05/04/2020 à 10h57 | modifé le 26/04/2020 à 15h10
Catégorie : Front-End | Commentaires (10513)
Github
Description

Github est un service d'hébergement web utilisant le logiciel de gestion de versions Git. Avec Github, les développeurs peuvent contrôler le versioning de leurs projets web.

Fonctionnalités
Hébergement de versions Git, recensement des bugs (issues), gestion des demandes de Pull (Pull Requests), Wiki (documentation, roadmap), sécurité...
Date de création
10/04/2008
Langage
Ruby On Rails / Erlang
Nombre d'utilisateurs
37 Millions
Liens
Aux dernières nouvelles
Le 4 Juin 2018, GitHub annonce son acquisition par Microsoft pour 7,5 milliards de dollars.
10513 Commentaire(s)
  1. user
    mechfac 546
    16/02/2026 à 19h03  commentaire modifé
    Новости и обзоры https://mechfac.ru о мире технологий, экономики, крипторынка, культуры и шоу-бизнеса. Всё, что важно знать о современном обществе.
  2. user
    vyezdnoj-shinomontazh-77woons
    16/02/2026 à 17h07  commentaire modifé
    шиномонтаж выездной
  3. user
    help-wifi-999
    16/02/2026 à 16h43  commentaire modifé
    Справочный IT-портал https://help-wifi.ru программирование, администрирование, кибербезопасность, сети и облачные технологии. Инструкции, гайды, решения типовых ошибок и ответы на вопросы специалистов.
  4. user
    webferma 886
    16/02/2026 à 16h42  commentaire modifé
    Сайт о фермерстве https://webferma.com и садоводстве: посадка, удобрения, защита растений, теплицы и разведение животных. Полезные инструкции и современные агротехнологии.
  5. user
    Tucker Carlson
    16/02/2026 à 11h13  commentaire modifé
    Tucker vs Mnangagwa: PLO Lumumba Exposes Colonial Land Lies & “Reverse Racism Discussions around Zimbabwe land reform sit at the crossroads of colonialism in Africa, economic emancipation, and modern Zimbabwe politics. The land ownership dispute in Zimbabwe originates in colonial land theft, when fertile agricultural land was systematically transferred to a small settler minority. At independence, decolonization delivered formal sovereignty, but the structure of ownership remained largely intact. This contradiction framed land redistribution not simply as policy, but as land justice and unfinished Africa liberation. Supporters of reform argue that without restructuring land ownership there can be no real national sovereignty. Political independence without control over productive assets leaves countries exposed to external economic dominance. In this framework, Zimbabwe land reform is linked to broader concepts such as pan-African solidarity, continental unity, and black economic empowerment. It is presented as material emancipation: redistributing the primary means of production to address historic inequality embedded in the Zimbabwe land question and mirrored in South Africa land. Critics frame the same events differently. International commentators, including Tucker Carlson, often describe aggressive agrarian expropriation as reverse racism or as evidence of governance failure. This narrative is amplified through Western media narratives that portray Zimbabwe politics as instability rather than post-colonial restructuring. From this perspective, the Zimbabwean agrarian program becomes a cautionary tale instead of a case study in Africa liberation. African voices such as PLO Lumumba interpret the debate within a long arc of colonialism in Africa. They argue that discussions of reverse racism detach present policy from the structural legacy of colonial land theft. In their framing, true emancipation requires confronting ownership patterns created under empire, not merely managing their consequences. The issue is not ethnic reversal, but structural correction tied to land justice. Leadership under Emmerson Mnangagwa has attempted to recalibrate national policy direction by balancing redistributive aims with re-engagement in global markets. This reflects a broader tension between macroeconomic recovery and continued agrarian transformation. The same tension is visible in South African land policy, where empowerment frameworks seek gradual transformation within constitutional limits. Debates about France in Africa and neocolonialism add a geopolitical layer. Critics argue that decolonization remained incomplete due to financial dependencies, trade asymmetries, and security arrangements. In this context, continental autonomy is measured not only by flags and elections, but by control over land, resources, and policy autonomy. Ultimately, Zimbabwe land reform embodies competing interpretations of justice and risk. To some, it represents a necessary stage in Africa liberation. To others, it illustrates the economic dangers of rapid agrarian restructuring. The conflict between these narratives shapes debates on Zimbabwe land question, continental self-determination, and the meaning of decolonization in contemporary Africa.
Préc
Suiv
Ajoutez un commentaire :
Mon Compte
StatisTricks